ALL MODELS WERE AT LEAST 18 YEARS OLD WHEN THEY WERE PHOTOGRAPHED OR FILMED
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement
Protecting Minors - This site is properly labeled by RTA (Restricted To Adults) label developed by ASACP
to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content.
Eroluv does not content producer. All content provided by 3rd parties you can find link on the source on each content page.
Vulgar set of photos
Flawless tits, legs, and pussy. Can’t say enough about how hot she is. Dibs on the first sip of wine out of the bottle.
superb set of pics probably the most explicit close ups of a girls wide open f..k…e ever seen on eroluv dont really like the bottle in her c..t much prefer 2 see a nice meat roll in it
I don’t like how the bottle was used in the set. That said why wasn’t I invited to the party
A lovely botty shot in doggy possie but don’t like splayed flaps and she has put me off champers for life!
She has that dirty girl with a cute face attitude. Excellent from behind although I have to agree with David, the photo set was lacking eroticism.
love the naughty in the inocent face. Not big on the arm tatoo ruins an other wise perfect woman.
All I’m looking at are her boobs and I really like them. It’s funny because really all these girls/women compared to the ‘normal’ women population out there are extremely beautiful. But I become very fussy about what I like and don’t like as far as breasts and actually other body parts are concerned in these pictures.
Some I’d love to hang on my wall because imo they are really beautiful and breathtaking but others – not so much. Just something in how I see them I guess. Some appeal…some don’t.
I’m mystified as to what David meant when he said that the set of pix was vulgar?
In what sense is it vulgar? I regard her squatting on a champers bottle pretty fookhing ordinary, but vulgar? Someone illuminate!!
Tony I think for him those pictures crossed the bounds of the definition of softcore porn. I mean there’s a difference between a woman showcasing her beautiful body versus inserting, stretching, or flexing her body in awkward manners. Basically, squatting on a bottle turns him off which I can understand.
Seneca, I wouldn’t try to turn an argument on the strength of one word – leave that for otherwise useless expensive lawyers. However on this occasion, having regard to possessing a conceptual idea of “vulgar”, I went to the online dictionary and it came up thus, amongst other definitions: “Conspicuously and tastelessly indecent”.
I agree that for a young lady to squat on a bottle is not a good look. Nevertheless in the context of this site, vulgar seems a harsh judgement. Polite society suggests that a lass with the dash to flash her gash for cash, is indeed behaving in a vulgar manner.
Then, what does the ordinary punter think as vulgar when it comes to young ladies disrobing for the lascivious demands of hornicultural males?
It could show amazing curves if we can see all her body liying
It looks quite vulgar to me. What ordinary lass would want to insert a champagne bottle up her twat?
I can dream I’m with you. So I look at your pictures which are outstanding and masturbate. That my beautiful lady is a compliment.