nice pair of puppies coupl of gud pussy close ups of her lovebox nicely ready 4 f…..g session
Eric on October 8, 2012 11:48 am
The close-up shots are nice so detailed.
PNF on October 8, 2012 12:49 pm
Best athletic nude on the site. Period.
Tony – the Original on October 8, 2012 1:08 pm
I’d say near enough to complete rubbish except for that detailed study of her pussy.
Seneca on October 12, 2012 2:35 am
Rubbish?! Haha you have no appreciation for art associated with the nude form do you. Igor Amelkovich’s work must’ve also been rubbish. Ill admit his stuff was better than this set, but you’ve got to admit she is fit. Not my type though to be honest.
Tony – the Original on October 13, 2012 12:09 am
You’ve come back from the dead Seneca?
I’m not convinced that this type of photography is ‘art’. The incredible close up of the model’s private bit transgresses mainstream art. Perhaps you might mount an argument that it is a fine line between art and porno???
Still not convinced.
Seneca on October 15, 2012 4:39 am
The very fact that a woman is naked means she showing off her sexuality. It seems that your definition of art is that it cannot evoke any lust or erotic feelings. In my opinion almost anything can be art but that said there are levels of sophistication. Porn/nude pictures is among the lowest forms of art since they rely heavily on the viewer’s sexual urge. Higher forms can stand further outside of man’s natural instincts and touch the mind or soul.
Tony – the Original on October 16, 2012 7:46 am
Ah Seneca! I did say ‘mainstream’ art so if you were to reread what I said then you might begrudgingly come to the conclusion that we are not worlds apart.
You can have nudes that aren’t porn and that is what we see here sometimes and I usually moan when it isn’t explicit enough. Whether this site invokes lust through explicit pix or just evokes lust through some of the more demure sets of pix is a moot point. Personally I visit this site for the former rather than the latter.
Linz on October 16, 2012 11:33 pm
I start with photo 1. Natalie has beautiful warm eyes and a lovely mouth. In short, a lovely sweet face. A ballerina she must be, free of the frilly costumes. Photos 1,12,14 are my favourites. The nudity is beautiful, and close up shots are a bonus !!!
bushmaster on October 21, 2012 3:57 am
I think photo14 is great she looks right at you and presents her beautiful breasts, photo15 is a beautiful picture of her vagina. Yummmmmmmy!
Tony – the Original on November 10, 2012 12:52 am
Thanks Bushmaster for pointing out the bleedin obvious!
Loading...
She is very perfect body
nice pair of puppies coupl of gud pussy close ups of her lovebox nicely ready 4 f…..g session
The close-up shots are nice so detailed.
Best athletic nude on the site. Period.
I’d say near enough to complete rubbish except for that detailed study of her pussy.
Rubbish?! Haha you have no appreciation for art associated with the nude form do you. Igor Amelkovich’s work must’ve also been rubbish. Ill admit his stuff was better than this set, but you’ve got to admit she is fit. Not my type though to be honest.
You’ve come back from the dead Seneca?
I’m not convinced that this type of photography is ‘art’. The incredible close up of the model’s private bit transgresses mainstream art. Perhaps you might mount an argument that it is a fine line between art and porno???
Still not convinced.
The very fact that a woman is naked means she showing off her sexuality. It seems that your definition of art is that it cannot evoke any lust or erotic feelings. In my opinion almost anything can be art but that said there are levels of sophistication. Porn/nude pictures is among the lowest forms of art since they rely heavily on the viewer’s sexual urge. Higher forms can stand further outside of man’s natural instincts and touch the mind or soul.
Ah Seneca! I did say ‘mainstream’ art so if you were to reread what I said then you might begrudgingly come to the conclusion that we are not worlds apart.
You can have nudes that aren’t porn and that is what we see here sometimes and I usually moan when it isn’t explicit enough. Whether this site invokes lust through explicit pix or just evokes lust through some of the more demure sets of pix is a moot point. Personally I visit this site for the former rather than the latter.
I start with photo 1. Natalie has beautiful warm eyes and a lovely mouth. In short, a lovely sweet face. A ballerina she must be, free of the frilly costumes. Photos 1,12,14 are my favourites. The nudity is beautiful, and close up shots are a bonus !!!
I think photo14 is great she looks right at you and presents her beautiful breasts, photo15 is a beautiful picture of her vagina. Yummmmmmmy!
Thanks Bushmaster for pointing out the bleedin obvious!
i like to see little puff
wish i could rate her with 10 stars
A load of bullshit actually.